Sitchins translations













Re sitchins translations

They are not commonly or even widely accepted by mainstream linguists of ancient languages. In my opinion he uses sources other than the tablets to add to the continuity and then makes assertions that most scolars strictly avoid.

The reason they are an important consideration is that the more one looks at ancient writings and technologies and out of place artifacts, the more something like this is completely believable wether true or false. Published as a work of fiction its entirely plausible given the artifacts and technologies that created vast underground tunneling on this planet. IMO its a great hypothesis even if its just fiction.

http://youtube.com/view_play_list?p=17B7457C41973D54

I watched all 76 of these

actual sumerian stories of the creation of man regarding the creation of mankind or rather the DNA manipulation of evolved primates. This story predates the akkadian semitic account in the torah.





Noah or ziusudra? Ziusudra predated noah by thousands of years and the story is exact in many ideas. So why would the semites claim ziusudra was a semite? He was definitely not a jew they didnt come along until after 3000bce and the progression was akkadian, semitic , hebrew and then jewish;

Why all the name changes? If you follow the jewish traditions the name changes were used to gain a foothold in each society they overtook with financial domination due to usury. and for ceturies the were pushed out of countries and even kept from the main populace for it and other ideologies as found in the talmud.